MM and agreed to the criticism, Mr. Star
relegated to the past time to be star Central , with the same idea, we also make a corresponding response text, and to further sort out our research on village governance and advocates Interpretations.
be a text that the central The shift of focus from the issue of democracy governance issues, from the village of autonomy within the exogenous value of the steering Mechanism, and then within the framework of autonomy in the village to discuss the village for treatment. This is the blessing in our place, but also the question of our beginning. But , we believe that approval is still doubt whether, in fact, to a large extent on the problem itself is a serious miscarriage of justice, in order to eliminate false positives, first of all on our Developmental Way of academic groups to sort out is essential, as the comb the commencement of the response to this question also from a financial one. [1]
according to the text of the statement should those of us who constitute the contemporary political and social research in rural China, the to look up, or doing research village governance. rural governance that rural governance, rather than autonomy, we tried to rural governance as a platform and the main line, by reading and understanding of rural society in transition, the governance changes and characteristics of top-down policy, legal and institutional implementation of the process in the rural areas, mechanisms and results to understand the Chinese countryside, which in rural China and China's overall modernization of the theory put forward our program of instructions and practice.
However, Tracing the source, our study Indeed, the formation of groups and Village Autonomy in inverted inextricably linked. Back in the 1980s, the older generation in political science and sociology scholars, such as Hou-an, Mr. Xin Qiushui change research orientation, in-depth research in rural areas, in the earliest not attracted much attention at the inception of the grass-roots grass-roots democracy and autonomy of the villagers and village self-government system in the drafting of relevant legal documents, which form the future of the country marked the beginning of villager autonomy. From the mid-1990s, Xu Yong, Xiang following Mr. Zhang Houan such as the right to undertake further research and to expand, the village self-government study on the expansion of the village governance. [2] can be said that it is Zhang, Xu and others of our group to come directly form the premises and rural studies basis, we have indeed along Zhang, Xu et al study came to be large ones. As a result, the text said the villagers should be discussed within the framework of autonomy village governance, indeed to see the logic of our study and the historical starting point However, they may be subject to some kind of knowledge and values of the structure in 1997n1999 years, during which they generally form two linked and there is tension both directions: First, from Hubei , gay-hui, who began by observing village elections in rural society in transition, the nature of the conscious perspective.
Koike Huangmei elusive town of a village hut village governance reform of the social experiment, the purpose was to try to time our knowledge about the villager autonomy theory into practice, to practice advocated by the Hou-An and the . However, it has witnessed in this experiment to each person with deep inspiration, Wuyi Deng people is through this test, recognized as an exogenous villager autonomy system and membrane of Chinese local society and rural researchers lack of knowledge in rural areas, and they sense it as the result of the initiation and began to consciously leave that was later summarized as understanding and interpretation (WU Yi, 2002, Chapter XIV epilogue).
with this general during the same period in 1998, compared with field researchers engaged in election observation and the opportunity to experience the rural political future, this group constitutes almost all our researchers are involved in village committee elections at this time of observation, we have observed elections in dozens of villages, in the village is a long time in January as short week, footprints all over the Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Sichuan, Inner Mongolia and other provinces. In order to understand the village committee elections, we made a number of villages to return survey. On this basis, we issued and published a number of treatises.
in these writings, we invariably prefer the creation of the village itself, but for various reasons it was quickly accepted by the system after a top-down by the government to give most of the villages, so it is basically a rural society in exogenous variables. (to be stars, 2005) Therefore, the election of the village and the village election is equivalent to two separate collisions between the objects and experiences. one hand, the election is no different in most of rural China in a stone into calm The lake, it is bound to stir the waves stirred up the original village of the daily political logic to the unfolding of events according to the activation of the election and pulled out of the daily life of the country long tired of all the layers and contradictions between the network so that people fortunate enough to clear observed in the prosaic life of the country show up in the drama is difficult to focus on rural political scene, and so the path to further explore the mechanism of the village and the hidden politics behind the presentation of the flow of social relations. [4] and another , the electoral system into the village field is also facing another scenario happened, it makes the viewer not only the opportunity to experience the new system into place that is bound to the fusion of theoretical and empirical issues, but also to experience the same system In a variety of different villages in the Field of interpretation process, and hence the reproduction is different from the original rules of the game is different from the rural political order of the new village election political mechanism. is precisely through this two-way encounter, as a collective consciousness, we realize the concept of village self-government and structure of the thing as a construction value in expressing concern of intellectuals, sometimes occur in the endogenous development of the village can not accommodate the complex needs and thus rise to the demand mechanism connecting macro-political sometimes occur in the formation of village development and micro mismatch. So, anything really experienced researchers observed village elections are inevitable not to think about this issue and trying to find the path to solve this puzzle, that is, through village elections and village self-government to remove the democratization of imagination and into the understanding of rural society itself into, trying to find the villagers in the village self-government within the society based on survival and development; also inevitably want to know not only in the rural village committee elections community how to start, but want to understand why the village committee election is so so, rather than expand in the rural society. As a result, the village committee election observation, historical and political circles as a group of Chinese researchers change of Villagers sight, into a wider field of rural social research incision path and strategy.
is along the direction of the development of such a search, we finally have a 2001 magazine and the China Social Sciences in the United Jingmen organized the from corporate restructuring, clan culture, the angle of the rise and fall to discuss village affairs and so on village governance, but also to replace the villagers of this period of autonomy of our new theme, [5] the final review meeting to community is echoed each other, although we mainly through specific studies of the referred to as the research to understand the current status of Chinese rural society and its regional differences, in order to understand autonomy as the villagers of rural society into a different process, mechanisms and consequences. [6] Subsequently, as the burden of farmers, rural organizations, rural finance, taxes reform, which constitutes the country's rural history and type of a broader range of content in this period were included in the study horizon. This series marks the shift the focus of our research and research framework for the transfer of recycling, it is this Steering and recycling, WU Yi only had a autonomy in the village, but the study to the narrative strategy is similar to consciously different from previous works.
in this conversion, the Wuyi Deng tried to change the depth of understanding of village society, and He Xuefeng and others are trying to and interpretation of, the dominant operation in rural China and its deep political and social mechanisms the final reason for the learning experience of operating to provide a more reliable platform. Xuefeng and others in a large number of rural research, then gradually was further that question, rural areas in Hubei Jingshan method of Rural Studies, organized the first high-level seminar, the same year in December, held in small seminar Jingmen rural areas, basic research specifically discuss the possibility of rural policy .2004 September, we organized the second session of the Rural Research Methods Advanced Seminar, invited anthropology, sociology, history, law and political science scholars from different disciplines such as multi-disciplinary understanding of the possibility and necessity in rural areas. service in the study steering, since 2003, we have gradually sub-regional, sub-topic in the research, research topics related to rural water, rural mediation, rural health, rural elderly security system and many rural areas, while research areas are mainly concentrated in the large rural population density west in an attempt to to understand the China's political development and political sociology, social development path of the decision, rather than the default can be man-made, nor as to be star said, the simplistic association between governance Following self-government as a household contract responsibility system of land after another institutional innovation in rural areas, whether it is the end of the underlying roots Zhao social, or benefit from the advancement of the upper structure or the intelligentsia, it at least provides an academic focus of the academic sink, will study the perspective of the world the opportunity to target the real world. Therefore, we believe, for the autonomy of villagers in itself is not a false problem (of course, wishful thinking to the interpretation and construction of village autonomy and the relationship between the path of political development in China is another matter), but also not to be stars, as is implied by the misreading of village politics and governance of the limitations of the village, but in the parting of the Enlightenment ideal of a simple question, after singing return. It is problem in such a regression, it is possible further to the perception, interpretation and explore and build capacity are relatively more inclusive governance problems of the village field, as was also possible (including Ying Xing) advocated it, and then to seek half of the 20th Century village of Rich Modern Studies and Overseas Chinese Village continuation of this outstanding academic tradition, and bathing the provision of In this sense, does not exist to say whether the star should be in the village should be discussed within the framework of autonomy village governance issues, governance or in the villages the villagers to discuss the issue of autonomy within the framework of the structuralist binary separation, rather said that it is through the practice of villager autonomy, political academic was able to criticism of our research orientation and research framework should have been more academic history and action for the inspection process itself, but less one or the other, outside of the
With the above research groups of our academic approach of self-representation can be more targeted response to the criticism of our star the next.
1, research perspective and research framework should
Man that was with how to control the problem Star, 2005) This is a criticism of my comrades-hui, we do not discuss in this article. However, should the text instead said: to discuss governance issues within the logic of the village should be within the framework of governance in the village to face the complexity of village autonomy. It is not difficult to find stars of our criticism should be completely inaccurate. Indeed, just as the text annotation should be pointed out as early as in 1999, He Xuefeng, believes that Villagers should be how to implement concerns, the author attempts to point out that the State has been years in the trial and formally promulgated and implemented, this is a policy that can no longer express different and even diametrically opposed views), but should focus on the framework of self-government in the village for the actual village in rural China, the political skills to design rich device Village Governance . Obviously, He Man here is for the policy debate, rather than the academic discussion, and therefore, He Man and the academic community has since we did not even without system, operation mechanism and performance, while recognizing that rural China. For example, WU Yi inspected six months of 1998 with a century in East dual political changes, one of the purposes is hoped that through the study of political history of the village, to understand the current the basis of village politics, or law and order in the village since the 20th century village in the entire course of treatment to locate and understand. Because of this, he may see a series of villager autonomy system design is mainly reflected from above, only civil affairs department under the policy to pursue, rather than the pursuit of other departments, and the pursuit of the various power sector policy also tension, to arrive at and more macro-level decisions about the governance of the normal features of the village, which is our system of villager autonomy in the performance evaluation must be considered a big problem Dong Leiming Northern Jiangsu Province in 2001 through the survey also believe that self-government in nature but the villagers in the countryside between floating layer of oil on the water (Donglei Ming, 2004). Xuefeng in 2002, pointed out: democratization of village governance, even possible a theoretical result, is paralyzed state of village governance and profit cycles in the Broker. carefully observe the current village-level governance in rural China, a number of areas of this cycle has been signs discussion of rural governance, on the contrary, when we talk about when the villager autonomy, it is advocated if I should sing it, and comrades-hui will be aware of, arrangements, there are many short-term behavior for rural cadres to the opportunity for personal gain, associated with a high degree of village society has the same action may be strong to resist. arrangements, but the village to maintain order in the relationship between fact and democracy is not large, but correlation with the village community village of the intrinsic nature of the relationship between the large the performance of self-government, we have more than a clear understanding should be stars. Through the practice of village autonomy investigation, we believe that Villagers can not in fact in many areas of governance to achieve policy goals intended, in some places, its role and even but as a stick into the water, will stir up old conflicts villages, resulting in new and serious problem. The purpose of self-government have been the villagers is to provide a new village order to address the problem of village public goods provision, but we also clearly see , in a considerable part of the village, but it may destroy the existing order in the village and make the supply of public goods in trouble. that in our internal discussions, an opinion or even that the concept of governance at the macro and institutional change in circumstances, the current reason for the universality of village governance to maintain order, and perhaps the text is not the villager autonomy system in place, but rather may be that it is not in place, because it's in place will not inevitably lead to conflicts between villages affected the achievement of national goals. [7] is not from the value of the above understanding and political action on the negative aspects of autonomy, but noted that no system exists with the up, down, left and right system and the relationship between various established contact, and its performance can not be judged in isolation. We have sought the whole observation and research, reveals the operation of the villagers and village autonomy within society the relationship between nature, the only way to contribute to a comprehensive and accurate evaluation of rural villager autonomy under the governance system also be possible to truly help improve this system.
but very unfortunately, should be noted that these stars would have never had to start in his criticism of the responsibility before the object has been criticized publicly noticed a large number of published academic speech , which, apart from regret, it'll also add to what?
2, reject Western theories, I hope directly to the field to create their own set of theories. careful study, they advocated the performance of wild thinking theory and anti-anti-Westernization both connections and differences between the two trend , 2005). for anti-Westernization, should be the next star, said, Can all of your West to cast their colored glasses and glasses? empiricism Orientation for the new theory of thinking. , but was present, was constructed. And no one's unique perception, the problem is not keen sense of social reality, even as gods like standing on the top, people may turn a blind eye Are there specific, and can not in a hurry to a conclusion.
what we actually do, and field research work already out there, I believe the critics before the commencement of criticism should be clear in the chest, or criticism Yiping will lose, or come and see us in the end here is how to present their theoretical claims. is quoted to be stars, more and more dominated by the Western academic discourse study of village governance hh stressed wild thinking, is to learn the essence of Western social science at the same time, deliberate attention to breakthroughs in Western social science research on village governance limitations of scientific knowledge from the West restrictions, but also from Western social science has been formed with the hegemony of the academic dogma of limited colors, and boldly put forward new ideas on village governance. , the introduction of Western social science theory is not only necessary, but the problem is not to be hh or not the introduction of Western social science, you do not wear tinted glasses from the West, but in social science from the West can not let the general default monopoly of China interpretation of reality. see more clearly the reality, but because it can be seen increasingly dominant position in the current Western social sciences from the tinted glasses can not see something, and can compete on this basis. competition easier for the many colored glasses to see the original appearance of the village government. with a colored glasses on. China's rural society, but that can not only use colored glasses view of Western China's rural society. We aim to be based on China's realities, learning from the West and China, based on local research to create a classic of our own colored glasses, which may be regarded as frivolous or ignore the academic tradition, perhaps because of capacity and energy (of course not rule out preference) intentionally or unintentionally omitted because a lot of Western literature (such as being left out or do not understand that Foucault), but do Not every scholar's dream and escape the embrace of the plight? Therefore, the anti-Western hat also right when the alert is only a friendly. Just think, if anyone dared to throw a hundred years to make the cultural accumulation of Western Learning, included in its formation under the influence and transformation of China's new culture, but also how to even the most basic living, let alone thinking and writing. This is a common sense, need not be self-evident to create problems discussion.
step forward both the theory is, there is no star said we should September 2004 we held the second method of Rural Studies, Senior Seminar class, WU Yi Village Politics in the summary of the research and development, the admitted imagination, but also enriched the vocabulary of their expression, and expand their research perspective, the social basis of political attention, in itself contributed to the maturity of political sociology. Again, through the help of anthropologists, political scientists not only learned The thematic concern of the rural research, more important is to master a new way of expression of the text is by some scholars to be hh anthropological field research, find and build the academic and the relationship between post-modern China. And by drawing on history, is also making a study of contemporary rural political vision of a more in-depth some useful social science concepts and theoretical paradigms, as long as its full explanatory power in rural China, and brought a little problem with that. At the same time, needs to be emphasized is that it strongly opposed to that in the study appear to rural China problem, but in reality desire for dialogue with the West br> listed above, we published the text is to show that we are not against the Western social science, much less the stars said to be anti-theoretical bent, but that should be the main place in China and rural China, to learn and absorb the West Science (including the existing academic knowledge in China). We must and have to learn Western social science, but we do not therefore found in Western social science is universally applicable truth, do not think it is only Western academic is the theory [10], but to maintain both academic and reflect the position of the full alert on our glasses to be used as casting materials. It is precisely because the out How come the words is embedded in the existing gray, hazy empirical phenomena that make them suitable for certain academic order of integration, called the knowledge and discovery, and as a ruler to cut a new object of observation and in life itself presentation of the logic of argumentation (which in itself imply the existence of certain of the reason first) to find the existing theory of collision and stirring, to construct it will no longer words such as civil society is not to be the kind of star to our definition of anti-Western and anti-theory of the this train on the post-modern, it is not longer be regarded as anti-Western or even non-theoretical, have to find the expression of Chinese thinking, Western-style), that is, field trips, such as Algeria, Bourdieu we got a class that contrary to civilized society We, the Western theory is still a need to make self-examination and the contrast of the such a context, Xuefeng Concerned only As a result, as the entry point to care for academic field research in rural China, because the lack of overall care, under the strong Western discourse is not difficult to ablation (loss) into the paradigms of Western social science. Based on the experience in China, and establish useful for understanding the social science of Chinese society, or how the general theory of social sciences in the West and China to establish correspondence between social reality, so that Western social sciences help to understand the Chinese Context The following issues do not those things in pursuit of the Chinese words corresponding to the fields of Western Research Institute to complete the task and with the agitation, In addition to the insufficiency of their own construction, is also thinking of the lack of the wild?
, of course, because of the time, energy and vision limitations, the main focus will be placed in rural China to understand the present, to determine our basic academic point to be More of practice and action, rather than simply the nature of dialogue or knowledge production. When we survey found that need general phenomenon, or can be established to judge, we a, or lost in the shallow, is ...
No comments:
Post a Comment